床旁经胸超声心动图对暴发性心肌炎与心肌梗死后行VA-ECMO支持患者的左心功能评估

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (2203 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的: 利用床旁经胸超声心动图对暴发性心肌炎与心肌梗死后行VA-ECMO支持患者的左心收缩功能进行评估,探讨床旁超声心动图在VA-ECMO支持治疗时的应用价值。方法: 回顾性分析在我院行VA-ECMO支持的患者32例,选取心源性休克并成功撤机的患者16例,分为暴发性心肌炎（8例）、心肌梗死（8例）两组,对两组内和两组间的一般临床资料以及VA-ECMO支持建立前、建立后24h和成功撤机后的左房内径（LAD）、左室舒张末期内径（LVDD）及射血分数（LVEF）进行对比。结果: （1）一般临床资料比较：较心肌梗死组平均年龄（64.1±6.9岁）,暴发性心肌炎组的平均年龄（34.2±9.0岁）更小。（2）组内比较：暴发性心肌炎组LVDD在VA-ECMO支持建立前平均水平（42.9±9.5）mm低于建立后24h平均水平（46.7±8.8）mm;成功撤机后LVEF平均水平（51.5±21.3）%高于建立后24h平均水平（33.9±18.4）%。心肌梗死组在VA-ECMO支持建立前、建立后24h、成功撤机后的LAD、LVDD及LVEF组内比较均无统计学差异。（3）两组间对比：暴发性心肌炎组LAD在VA-ECMO支持建立前、建立后24h和成功撤机后均低于急性心肌梗死组;VA-ECMO支持建立前心肌梗死组LVDD平均水平大于暴发性心肌炎组;成功撤机后暴发性心肌炎组的LVEF高于急性心肌梗死组。结论: VA-ECMO支持可以明显改善暴发性心肌炎组患者的LVEF,暴发性心肌炎对心功能的影响可能可逆;VA-ECMO支持对心肌梗死组LAD、LVDD、LVEF的改善不明显,但可以为其他目的的治疗争取一段时间;暴发性心肌炎组LAD在VA-ECMO支持建立前、建立后24h和成功撤机后转出ICU前均低于急性心肌梗死组;年龄、LAD、LVDD可能影响心功能的恢复。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杨薇
	徐明
	王得恩
	章向成

关键词 ： VA-ECMO, 超声心动图, 左心功能, 暴发性心肌炎, 心肌梗死

Abstract：Objective To evaluate the left ventricular systolic function of patients with fulminant myocarditis and myocardial infarction during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) therapy using bedside transthoracic echocardiography, so as to explore the application value of bedside echocardiography during VA-ECMO therapy. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on 32 patients undergoing VA-ECMO support in our hospital. Sixteen patients with cardiogenic shock and successful weaning were selected and divided into two groups: the fulminant myocarditis group (n=8) and the myocardial infarction group (n=8). Further inter-group and intra-group comparisons were performed on the general clinical data, left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before VA-ECMO support, 24 hours after VA-ECMO support, and after the successful weaning, respectively. Results (1) Comparison of general clinical data: The average age of the fulminant myocarditis group was smaller than that of the myocardial infarction group [(34.2±9.0) vs. (64.1±6.9) years]. (2) Comparison within groups: The average level of LVDD before VA-ECMO support establishment in explosive myocarditis group was lower than that after 24h (46.7±8.8) mm. The average level of LVEF after successful weaning was higher than that 24 hours after VA-ECMO support [ (51.5±21.3) % vs. (33.9±18.4) %]. Furthermore, in the myocardial infarction group, there were no significant differences in LAD, LVDD and LVEF before VA-ECMO support was established, 24h after VA-ECMO support was established, and after successful withdrawal. (3) Comparison between the two groups: The LAD in explosive myocarditis group was lower than that in acute myocardial infarction group before VA-ECMO support was established, 24h after VA-ECMO support was established and after successful withdrawal. The average LVDD level of the myocardial infarction group was higher than that of the fulminant myocarditis group before VA-ECMO support. Besides, The LVEF of explosive myocarditis group was higher than that of acute myocardial infarction group. Conclusions VA-ECMO support can significantly improve LVEF in patients with myocarditis and the impact of fulminant myocarditis on cardiac function is possibly reversible. VA-ECMO support did not significantly improve LAD, LVDD and LVEF in myocardial infarction group, but could buy a period of time for other purposes of treatment. LAD in explosive myocarditis group was lower than that in acute myocardial infarction group before VA-ECMO support was established, 24h after VA-ECMO support was established, and before ICU transfer after successful withdrawal . Age, LAD and LVDD may affect the recovery of cardiac function.

Key words： VA-ECMO echocardiography left ventricular function fulminant myocarditis myocardial infarction

收稿日期: 2022-11-08

中图分类号:

R542.2+1

基金资助:淮安市科技项目（HAP202105）; 2020年度省第五期“333工程”科研项目资助计划（BRA2020233）

通讯作者: 王得恩,E-mail：wangdeen11@163.com

引用本文:

杨薇, 徐明, 王得恩, 章向成. 床旁经胸超声心动图对暴发性心肌炎与心肌梗死后行VA-ECMO支持患者的左心功能评估[J]. 金宝搏官方188学报(医学版), 2023, 20(1): 52-56. YANG Wei, XU Ming, WANG De'en, ZHANG Xiangcheng. Bedside Transthoracic Echocardiography in Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Fulminant Myocarditis and Myocardial Infarction Undergoing VA-ECMO Support. HuNan ShiFan DaXue XueBao(YiXueBan), 2023, 20(1): 52-56.

链接本文:

http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V20/I1/52

[1] Preau S, Bortolotti P, Colling D, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of the inferiorvenac avacollapsi bilitytopr edictf luid responsive nessin spontaneously breathing patients with sepsis and acute circulatory failure[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45(3): e290-e297.
[2] 郭娟, 王浩, 杨远婷, 等. 超声心动图参数对难治性心源性休克患者静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合撤机后短期预后的预测价值[J]. 中华医学影像学杂志, 2021, 30(10): 829-835.
[3] Wang L, Wang H, Hou X.Clinical outcomes of adult patients who receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2018, 32(5): 2087-2093.
[4] Na SJ, Yang JH, Yang JH, et al.Left heart decompression at venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation in cardiogenic shock: prophylactic versus therapeutic strategy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(9) : 3746-3756.
[5] 郭娟, 易仁凤, 王浩, 等. 超声对急性暴发性心肌炎患者静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合支持下血流动力学评估的初步研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2019, 28(11): 927-932.
[6] 国家老年医学中心国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心, 中国老年医学学会心血管病分会, 北京医学会心血管病学会影像学组. 中国成人心力衰竭超声心动图规范化检查专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(05): 422-436.
[7] Keebler ME, HaddadEV, Choi CW, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock[J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2018, 6(6): 503-516.
[8] McRae K, de Perrot M. Principles and indications of extracorporeal life support in general thoracic surgery[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(suppl8): S931-S946.
[9] Jayaraman AL, Cormican D, Shah P, et al.Cannulation strategies in adult veno-arterial and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: techniques, limitations, and special considerations[J]. Ann Card Anaesth, 2017, 20(suppl): S11-S18.
[10] Kulkarni T, Sharma NS, Diaz-Guzman E.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults: apractcal guide for internists[J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2016, 83(5): 373-384.
[11] Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R.Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2018, 11(9): e004905.
[12] 张忠满, 陈旭峰, 张劲松, 等. 急性暴发性心肌炎患者体外膜肺氧合治疗后左心收缩功能观察研究[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2020, 29(02): 213-216.
[13] Puerto E, Tavazzi G, Gambaro A, et al.Interaction between VA-ECMO and the right ventricle[J]. Hellenic J Cardiol, 2022, 68: 17-24.
[14] Welker CC, Huang J, Boswell MR, et al.Left Ventricular Decompression in VA-ECMO: Analysis of Techniques and Outcomes[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2022, 36(11): 4192-4197.
[15] Napp LC, Kühn C, Hoeper MM, et al.Cannulation strategies for percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2016, 105: 283-296.
[16] Distelmaier K, Niessner A, Haider D, et al.Long-term mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac assist after cardiovascular surgery[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39: 1444-1451.
[17] Chocron S, Perrotti A, Durst C, et al.Left ventricular venting through the right subclavian artery access during peripheral extracorporeal life support[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2013, 17: 187-189.