学龄前儿童斜视矫正术后苏醒期谵妄的列线图模型的建立

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (7)

全文:PDF(2006 KB)HTML(1 KB)
输出:BibTeX|EndNote(RIS)

摘要目的:建立学龄前儿童全麻斜视矫正术后苏醒期谵妄的列线图模型,以早期识别危险因素,采取针对性措施。方法:选取2021年1月—2021年10月全麻下接受斜视矫正术治疗的317例学龄前儿童为研究对象,于患儿苏醒期进行谵妄和疼痛评估,采用Logistic回归分析患儿出现苏醒期谵妄的影响因素,运用R软件构建预测学龄前儿童全麻斜视矫正术后发生苏醒期谵妄的风险列线图模型。结果:317例患儿中有67例（21.1%）出现苏醒期谵妄,并根据其是否发生术后谵妄分为谵妄组（n=67）和非谵妄组（n=250）。单因素结果显示,谵妄组的患儿在年龄≤3岁、美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）分级Ⅱ级、重度疼痛的比例和手术时长高于非谵妄组;Logistic回归分析显示患儿年龄（OR=4.588,95%CI：2.401~8.768）、ASA分级（OR=4.102,95%CI：2.125~7.922）、疼痛程度（OR=3.589,95%CI：2.358~5.463）是学龄前儿童斜视矫正术后苏醒期谵妄的危险因素。对列线图进行验证,校准曲线拟合良好,AUC（95%CI）为0.841（0.789~0.894）,灵敏度和特异度分别为80.80%（95%CI：75.4%~85.5%）和71.64%（95%CI：59.3%~82.0%）。结论:学龄前儿童斜视矫正术后存在一定的谵妄风险,低年龄组、ASA分级较高、中重度疼痛是患儿更易发生苏醒期谵妄的危险因素,据此构建的列线图模型对患儿发生苏醒期谵妄有较好预测价值,提示医护人员需要在儿童围术期提供个性化管理。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	冯莹
	景娇娜
	王建设
	陈丽娜

关键词：学龄前儿童,斜视矫正术,谵妄,影响因素,列线图

Abstract：ObjectiveTo establish the nomogram model of delirium in preschool children after strabismus correction under general anesthesia in order to identify risk factors early and take targeted measures.Methods317 preschool children who were treated with strabismus correction under general anesthesia from January 2021 to October 2021 were selected as the study objects. Delirium and pain were evaluated during the awakening period of the children. Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of delirium in the awakening period, and R software was used to construct a nomogram model to predict the risk of delirium after strabismus correction under general anesthesia in preschool children.ResultsAmong 317 children, 67(21.1%) had delirium in the awakening period, and were divided into delirium group (n=67) and non delirium group (n=250) according to whether they had postoperative delirium. The univariate results showed that children in the delirium group had higher proportion of aged≤3 years old, the American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade II, severe pain and longer operation duration than that in the non-delirium group; Logistic regression analysis showed that the age (OR=4.588, 95%CI: 2.401~8.768), ASA grade (OR=4.102, 95%CI: 2.125~7.922) and pain degree (OR=3.589, 95%CI: 2.358~5.463) of preschool children were the risk factors for delirium after strabismus correction. The nomogram was verified, and the calibration curve fit well, and the AUC (95%CI) was 0.841(0.789~0.894), the sensitivity and specificity were 80.80% (95% CI: 75.4%~85.5%) and 71.64% (95% CI: 59.3%~82.0%), respectively .ConclusionThere is a certain risk of delirium in preschool children after strabismus correction. Low age group, higher ASA grade and moderate to severe pain are the risk factors for children to develop delirium in the awakening period. The nomogram model constructed on this basis has a good predictive value for the occurrence of delirium in children during awakening, which suggests that medical personnel need to provide personalized management in the perioperative period of children.

Key words：preschool children strabismus correction delirium influence factor nomogram

收稿日期:2022-12-06

中图分类号:

R779.7

基金资助:江苏省妇幼保健协会科研项目（FYX202112）

通讯作者:景娇娜,E-mail：jiaonajing@126.com

引用本文:

冯莹, 景娇娜, 王建设, 陈丽娜. 学龄前儿童斜视矫正术后苏醒期谵妄的列线图模型的建立[J]. 金宝搏官方188学报(医学版), 2023, 20(4): 91-95. FENG Ying, JING Jiaona, WANG Jianshe, CHEN Lina. Establishment of nomogram model of delirium after strabismus correction in preschool children. HuNan ShiFan DaXue XueBao(YiXueBan), 2023, 20(4): 91-95.

链接本文:

http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/或http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V20/I4/91

[1] 姚汉青, 刘林, 钱兴华, 等. 右美托咪定对扁桃体腺样体切除术后儿童全麻苏醒期躁动和谵妄的影响[J]. 浙江医学, 2022, 44(11): 1192-1197.
[2] Dahmani S, Delivet H, Hilly J.Emergence delirium in children: an update[J]. Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2014, 27(3): 309-315.
[3] Lee JH, Choi S, Lee M, et al.Effect of magnesium supplementation on emergence delirium and postoperative pain in children undergoing strabismus surgery: a prospective randomised controlled study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2020, 20(1): 289.
[4] Mason KP.Paediatric emergence delirium: a comprehensive review and interpretation of the literature[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2017, 118(3): 335-343.
[5] Sobol M, Sobol MK, Kowal M.Adult behavior toward the child before surgery and pediatric emergence delirium[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2022, 32(1): 43-48.
[6] 王永霞, 丁卉, 陈晓, 李眉, 等. 预测学龄前儿童反复发生上呼吸道感染风险的列线图模型建立[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1791-1795.
[7] Sikich N, Lerman J.Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale[J]. Anesthesiology, 2004, 100(5): 1138-1145.
[8] 王贝贝, 许爱军. 小儿全身麻醉苏醒期谵妄防治进展[J]. 医学综述, 2019, 25(04): 789-794.
[9] Voepel-Lewis T, Merkel S, Tait AR, et al.The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment[J]. Anesth Analg, 2002, 95(5): 1224-1229
[10] 王娟, 丁敏, 刘小琴, 等. FLACC量表用于学龄前儿童术后疼痛评估的信效度评价[J]. 江苏医药, 2015, 41(11): 1298-1300.
[11] 刘柯显, 冯静怡, 徐红贞, 等. 儿童耳鼻喉术后谵妄发生现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2021, 2(01): 70-74.
[12] 宋雨童, 颜明. 学龄前儿童麻醉后苏醒期谵妄的危险因素及防治研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2020, 60(20): 98-102.
[13] 林楠, 刘柯显, 冯静怡, 等. 儿童术后谵妄发生现况及危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志 (电子版), 2021, 14(05): 386-392.
[14] 李瑛, 李贤煌, 胡燕, 等. 心脏外科术后患者发生谵妄危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2022, 39(06): 72-76.
[15] 吕娟. 先天性心脏病患儿术后谵妄发生现状及其危险因素研究[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2022.
[16] 鲁军帅, 孙倩倩, 宋佳佳, 等. 脑胶质瘤患者术后谵妄现状及其影响因素分析: 一项前瞻性巢式病例对照研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2022, 37(13): 1231-1235+1247.
[17] 黄云, 韩霞, 付会敏. 舒适化镇静镇痛在先心术后小儿谵妄护理中的应用效果[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2021, 37(13): 2293-2295.
[18] 何珊, 王亚力, 左泽兰. 中文版康奈尔儿童谵妄量表的临床初步应用[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2019, 57(05): 344-349.
[19] 王永波, 卢秀波, 张清君, 等. 全麻甲状腺癌根治术患者苏醒期谵妄发生的列线图预测模型的建立[J]. 郑州大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 55(03): 386-390.
[20] 王玉慧, 温超, 金锦花, 等. 小儿术后谵妄临床研究进展[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2021, 42(08): 859-863.
[21] Jang YE, Jeong SA, Kim SY, et al.The efficacy of intraoperative EEG to predict the occurrence of emergence agitation in the postanesthetic room after sevoflurane anesthesia in children[J]. J Perianesth Nurs, 2018, 33(1): 45-52.
[22] 韩亚倩. 脑电参数指导下的麻醉管理对小儿苏醒期谵妄的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南大学, 2022.