经颅磁刺激治疗对不同类型慢性每日头痛患者功能障碍、疼痛程度及自我效能的影响

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (4)

全文: PDF (1928 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的：探讨经颅磁刺激治疗对不同类型慢性每日头痛患者功能障碍、疼痛程度及自我效能的影响。方法：选取2021年1月―2022年12月本院160例慢性每日头痛患者为研究对象。随机单盲法分组：对照组（80例）给予常规综合治疗,研究组（80例）在对照组基础上给予经颅磁刺激治疗。比较两组之间、组内不同类型患者之间治疗前后功能障碍分级、视觉模拟评分法（VAS）、头痛发作频率及一般自我效能感量表（GSES）评分,统计临床疗效。结果：治疗后2、3、4周,研究组功能障碍分级、VAS评分、头痛发作频率均低于对照组,GSES评分高于对照组,两组内不同类型患者功能障碍分级、VAS评分、头痛发作频率及GSES评分比较,差异无统计学意义。研究组总有效率为95.00%,高于对照组的73.75%;两组内不同类型患者之间总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义。结论：慢性每日头痛患者常规综合治疗同时应用经颅磁刺激可减轻功能障碍、疼痛程度,改善自我效能感,增强疗效,且不同类型慢性每日头痛患者效果相似。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈莹
	舒孔亮
	李元
	周颖

关键词 ：慢性每日头痛, 慢性偏头痛, 慢性紧张性头痛, 经颅磁刺激, 功能障碍, 疼痛程度, 自我效能

Abstract：Objective To investigate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on dysfunction, pain degree and self-efficacy in patients with different types of chronic daily headache. Method One hundred and sixty patients with chronic daily headache in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as the research objects. Randomized single-blind grouping: the control group (80 cases) received routine comprehensive treatment, while the research group (80 cases) received transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment on the basis of the control group. The functional classification, visual analog scale (VAS), headache frequency and general self-efficacy scale (GSES) scores before and after treatment were compared between the two groups and among different types of patients within the group. The clinical efficacy were statistically analyzed. Results 2, 3, 4 weeks after treatment, the dysfunction grade, VAS score and headache attack frequency of the study group were lower than those of the control group, while the GSES score was higher than that of the control group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in functional impairment grade, VAS score, headache frequency and GSES score of different types of patients. The total effective rate of the study group was 95.00%, higher than 73.75% of the control group, there was no significant difference in total effective rate between different types of patients in the two groups. Conclusion Routine comprehensive treatment for patients with chronic daily headache combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation can alleviate dysfunction and pain, improve self-efficacy, and enhance efficacy, and the effects of different types of chronic daily headache patients are similar.

Key words： chronic daily headache chronic migraine chronic tension headache transcranial magnetic stimulation dysfunction the degree of pain self-efficacy

收稿日期: 2023-02-20

中图分类号:

R741.05

基金资助:长沙市2020年度指导性科技计划项目（kzd2001085）

通讯作者: 舒孔亮,E-mail：skl19770410@163.com

引用本文:

陈莹, 舒孔亮, 李元, 周颖. 经颅磁刺激治疗对不同类型慢性每日头痛患者功能障碍、疼痛程度及自我效能的影响[J]. 金宝搏官方188学报(医学版), 2023, 20(5): 51-55. CHEN Ying, SHU Kongliang, LI Yuan, ZHOU Ying. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on dysfunction, pain degree and self-efficacy in patients with different types of chronic daily headache. HuNan ShiFan DaXue XueBao(YiXueBan), 2023, 20(5): 51-55.

链接本文:

http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V20/I5/51

[1] Yamani N, Olesen J.New daily persistent headache: a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder[J]. J Headache Pain, 2019, 20(1): 80-84.
[2] Connelly M, Sekhon S.Current perspectives on the development and treatment of chronic daily headache in children and adolescents[J]. Pain Manag, 2019, 9(2): 175-189.
[3] Kahriman A, Zhu S.Migraine and tension-type headache[J]. Semin Neurol, 2018, 38(6): 608-618.
[4] Elizagaray-García I, Carvalho GF, Szikszay TM, et al.Psychophysical testing in chronic migraine and chronic tension type headache: An observational study[J]. Cephalalgia, 2022, 42(7): 618-630.
[5] Lobo R, Wang M, Lobo S, et al.Time to retire 'New daily persistent headache': Mode of onset of chronic migraine and tension-type headache[J]. Cephalalgia, 2022, 42(4): 385-395.
[6] Spanou I, Bougea A, Liakakis G, et al.Relationship of migraine and tension-type headache with hypothyroidism: A literature review[J]. Headache, 2019, 59(8): 1174-1186.
[7] Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, et al.Evidence based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2020, 131(2): 474-528.
[8] Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version)[J]. Cephalagia, 2013, 33(9): 629-808.
[9] 朱盼盼, 袁良津, 王雷. 高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗偏头痛的临床研究[J]. 安徽医药, 2015, 19(8): 1565-1566.
[10] Knop C, Oeser M, Bastian L, et al.Development and validation of the visual analogue scale (VAS) spine score[J]. Der Unfallchirurg, 2001, 104(6): 488-497.
[11] 梁国泰, 王丽娟, 蔺金霞, 等. 重复经颅磁刺激治疗偏头痛发作的疗效观察[J]. 甘肃医药, 2021, 40(4): 329-330+333.
[12] Janiszewska M, Kulik T, Żołnierczuk-Kieliszek D,et al.General self-efficacy level and health behaviours in women over the age of 45 years who have undergone osteoporosis treatment[J]. Prz Menopauzalny, 2017,16(3):86-95.
[13] 叶树君, 华赛美, 何佳. 氟桂利嗪联合头痛宁治疗偏头痛临床疗效及对血清TNF-α、ICAM-1和CGRP水平的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2022, 40(8): 151-153.
[14] 陶录岭. 丹珍头痛胶囊联合阿米替林对紧张性头痛患者HAMA评分及生活质量的影响[J]. 中国地方病防治杂志, 2018, 33(1): 113-114.
[15] Burke MJ, Fried PJ, Pascual-Leone A.Transcranial magnetic stimulation: neurophysiological and clinical applications[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2019, 163: 73-92.
[16] Cash RFH, Cocchi L, Lv J, et al.Functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided personalization of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depression[J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2021, 78(3): 337-339.
[17] 范福玲, 王静. 中文版头痛管理自我效能感简式量表的信效度研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2017, 20(17): 2118-2122.
[18] 张斗凤, 唐向阳, 江伟, 等. 高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗无先兆偏头痛的临床研究[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2021, 20(7): 711-715.
[19] 张晓玲, 何伟亮, 孙海青, 等. 重复经颅磁刺激治疗偏头痛患者的临床研究[J]. 脑与神经疾病杂志, 2020, 28(1): 11-13.
[20] 刘晨慧, 林佛财, 张伟, 等. 重复经颅磁刺激治疗慢性紧张型头痛疗效观察[J]. 海南医学, 2022, 33(18): 2359-2362.
[21] 王雷, 施雪英, 袁良津, 等. 高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗慢性紧张型头痛的临床观察[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2022, 21(6): 600-605.